Welcome to the FRED Measles Epidemic Simulator

FRED (A Framework for Reconstructing Epidemiological Dynamics) is a freely available open-source agent-based modeling system for exploring the spatial and temporal patterns of epidemics.

The system is currently undergoing maintenance. Please visit again later.

Welcome to the FRED Measles Epidemic Simulator

FRED (A Framework for Reconstructing Epidemiological Dynamics) is a freely available open-source agent-based modeling system for exploring the spatial and temporal patterns of epidemics.

This site shows possible outbreaks following the introduction of a single measles case in selected US cities. The model shows the importance of a high vaccination rate in providing protection for the entire community.

 

Funding

This work is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under MIDAS grant U54GM088491 and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the software.

Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back Get started

FRED simulates the spread of infectious disease through an artificial population that accurately represents the demographic and geographic distributions in a given region, including realistic household, school, and workplace social contact patterns. Each simulation begins with the infection of a single school-age child, and as people interact in households, neighborhoods, schools, and workplaces, the disease may be transmitted from an infectious person to a susceptible person. Simulations are currently available for every state and county in the United States, and for selected international locations.

FRED was developed by the University of Pittsburgh Public Health Dynamics Laboratory in collaboration with the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center and the School of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University.

The Measles Simulations

The simulation begins with a single school-age child contracting measles, and shows the possible spread of the disease in the nine months after the initial case. Red dots show the household location of infected people, and blue dots show the household location of recovered people. If more than a few cases appear, this indicates that herd immunity has been lost and the disease spreads easily. If only a few cases appear, herd immunity is still in place.

Two scenarios are shown. In one scenario, it is assumed that 80% of children 1 to 15 years old have been vaccinated against measles. In the other scenario, it is assumed that 95% of children 1 to 15 years old have been vaccinated against measles. Everyone else is assumed to have 95% vaccine coverage. In most cases, the difference between the 80% coverage scenario and the 95% coverage scenario is quite dramatic. This shows the importance of a high vaccination rate in providing protection for the entire community.

The model makes several assumptions that might affect the results:

1. It is assumed that infants less than 1 year of age have residual immunity from their mothers, and that 95% people over 15 years of age have been vaccinated. These assumptions are conservative: infant immunity probably wanes between 6 months and one year of age, and the vaccination rate among those over 15 years old may be less than 95% in practice. The results of the model may therefore underestimate the number of cases.

2. It is assumed that the measles vaccine is 97% effective in producing immunity in those vaccinated. In reality, a single dose of vacine is estimated to have 93% effectiveness, and two doses are required to achieve 97% effectiveness (CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/measles/hcp/). The model makes the optimistic assumption that all vaccinees have received two doses of vaccine. This assumption may also cause the model to underestimate the number of cases.

3. The model assumes that vaccination rates do not vary substantially by location. In fact, it is known that vaccination coverage varies by locations, with clusters of lower vaccination rate occurring in some locations, possibly due to anti-vaccination sentiment. Other studies have shown that clustering of low immunity tends to increase the risk of measles outbreaks in those areas. Therefore, the assumtion of uniform coverage is conservative, predicting fewer measles cases than might occur in practice due to clusters of lower immunity.

4. How people behave when they are sick has a big impact on the spread of disease. The model assumes that individuals in the prodromal period (the few days before the rash appears) will stay home due to their symptoms about 50% of the time. This assumption is similar to assumptions made in influenza models, since the symptoms during the prodromal period are similar to influenza. The model assumes that once the rash appears, 90% of individuals who are not already confined to the home will decide each day to stay home for the remainder of the illness. While these assumptions appear to be reasonable, they have not been established through systematic studies. Therefore, the number of cases predicted by the model may be higher or lower than observed in practice, depending on the rapidity with which measles patients withdraw to the home.

5. Public health interventions have a large impact on the size of measles outbreaks. When a measles case occurs, it is common practice in the United States to conduct an investigation that tries to identify each possible contact the infectious person may have had during the infectious period, isolating and vaccinating any potentially susceptible contacts. This is called "contact tracing". It is generally impossible to determine all the contact, especially those made in the general community (Porco 2015). In the current model, contact tracing is assumed to successfully identify about 50% of the contacts and convince them to isolate themselves at home. Different levels of success in contact tracing might increase of decrease the number of measles cases (Porco 2015).

Funding

This work is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under MIDAS grant U54GM088491 and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the software.

Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Home

Simulation of the spread of a measles outbreak showing the effects of population vaccination coverage:

Instructions:
1. Select a state
2. Select a city
3. Click to see the results of a measles outbreak with vaccination coverage of 80% (below herd immunity threshold).
4. Press Done
5. Click to see the results of a measles outbeak with vaccination coverage of 95% (providing herd immunity).

Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Cancel
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back
Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh

You don't have any favorites yet

Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh
Back Next

Select a scenario:

Full Site
© 2015 University of Pittsburgh